Dominic Chappell, the former BHS owner, has been banned from holding any company directorships for the next 10 years by the Insolvency Service.
The man who purchased BHS for ÂŁ1 from Sir Philip Green a year before it collapsed with the loss of 11,000 jobs, has been banned from being involved in the âpromotion, formation or management of a companyâ for the next decade by the High Court.
The court found Chappell âwrongfully diverted ÂŁ1.5m of funds from BHS Limited to a company based in Swedenâ the day after the possibility of an administrator being appointed to the business had been discussed with its board.
Chappell also transferred âin excess of ÂŁ1m to Retail Acquisitions Limitedâ, a company he was the director and 90% shareholder of at the time. The court said those funds should have been retained by BHS and its property arms âas proceeds from property sales in Londonâs Oxford Street and Sunderlandâ.
While director of Retail Acquisitions, Chappell was found to have âfailed to maintain, preserve or deliver adequate accounts recordsâ to the Insolvency Service, which led to investigators being unable to verify the shares Chappellâs company bought in a Portuguese property company.
The inadequate records kept by Chappell meant investigators were âunable to explain or verify the circumstances under whichâ he caused Retail Acquisitions to borrow ÂŁ500,000 without the knowledge of his co-directors.
Chappell bought a US company with ÂŁ275,000 of the Retail Acquisitions loan, with the remaining ÂŁ221,960 balance used to pay a company where Joseph Chappell, his father, was âa de facto directorâ.
Joseph Chappell has been banned from holding any business directorships for five years.
The court also found Dominic Chappell failed to comply with obligations requiring BHSâ pensions liabilities at the time it collapsed.
Assistant director for the Insolvency Service Claire Entwistle said: âBoth Dominic and his father abused their responsibilities as directors. Not only did they carry out reckless financial transactions, but they failed to maintain adequate company records â a basic requirement for any responsible director.
âThe courts have recognised the severity of their actions and the bans handed down will seriously curtail their opportunities to manage companies.â


















No comments yet