Waitrose has been accused of forcing reduced redundancy payouts on some of its warehouse staff who were at risk of losing their jobs.

The supermarket chain is under fire after offering impacted staff a lower reundancy package, despite having proposed âa more generous payoutâ in January this year, according to The Telegraph.
Staff are now expected to receive one weekâs pay for every year of service rather than the previous two-week policy, on top of the statutory redundancy, which was âhigher than typical market practiceâ.
Earlier this year Waitrose parent company John Lewis Partnership announced plans to halve redundancy payouts.
The newspaper reported that staff claimed that a review into the anticipated closure of a warehouse in Enfield had begun before the changes to redundancy packages were made.
However, JLP claimed a counter-proposal was rejected and the Enfield closure was formally settled on March 6, âafter the announcement of the new redundancy pay termsâ.
More than 500 workers are said to be at risk of redundancy at the Enfield site whose closure is expected to save Waitrose around ÂŁ8.7m.
A spokesman for Waitrose said: âFollowing a detailed review and consultation with local partners, weâve taken the decision to close our Enfield site.
âUnfortunately, excess capacity elsewhere in our network along with rising rent meant it was no longer a viable option to keep the site open.
âItâs in no way a reflection of the team, and our focus is now on offering them our full support ahead of the closure. Weâve also put measures in place to mitigate any impact on customer service.â
JLP confirmed it would not be awarding a partnership bonus this year as it steams ahead on its turnaround strategy.


















1 Reader's comment