More than 3,000 former Woolworths staff have been fighting for compensation since 2008 but today reached the end of the road in their battle.
Woolworths collapses, resulting in over 800 store closures and around 27,000 job losses. 3,233 employees worked at stores with fewer than 20 staff members.
Clothing retailer Ethel Austin enters administration. 490 employees are made redundant having been employed at locations with 20 or more employees, 469 at its head office and distribution centre at Knowsley, Liverpool, and 21 at its Edgware store.
However, 1,210 employees are made redundant and receive no protective award since they were at shops with fewer than 20 staff.
Shop workers union USDAW wins compensation worth tens of millions of pounds for 25,000 former employees of both businesses, but around 1,200 former employees of Ethel Austin and 3,200 former employees of Woolworths are denied compensation because they worked in stores with fewer than 20 staff.
USDAW wins a legal case at the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) that entitles Woolworths and Ethel Austin staff who worked at stores with fewer than 20 staff to compensation.
EAT requires UK legislation to be rewritten in line with EU principles, so that the establishment where workers were based becomes irrelevant.
The Government is granted leave to appeal the decision and apologises for its non-attendance at the original hearing. Government is ordered to pay USDAW’s full costs for the forthcoming appeal.
Court of Appeal refers the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
CJEU hears the case and reveals the Advocate General will publish an opinion in February.
Europe’s Advocate General upholds UK’s long-held view on collective redundancy.
30 April 2015
European Court of Justice ratifies Advocate General’s decision and USDAW declares it is “end of the road” for former Woolworths and Ethel Austin staff seeking “justice”.
However, law firm Irwin Mitchell argues: “It is worth noting that this is not necessarily the end of the road for the Woolworths claim.
“The case will be returned to the referring court (in this case the Court of Appeal) to determine whether the original tribunal was correct to treat the individual stores as separate establishments.
“However, given that it will have to determine this question in light of the ECJ’s findings on the meaning of establishment, it is unlikely that the court will reach a different decision.”
Woolworths staff lose compensation fight in landmark redundancy ruling
- Currently reading
Timeline of ex-Woolworths staff's unsuccessful battle for compensation