Gap has done a rapid about face and said that it would revert to its traditional blue box logo after a disastrous reaction to a new logo unveiled in America last week.
Gap North America president Marka Hansen said in a statement today that the US casualwear giant had not approached the launch of the new logo in the âright wayâ.
She added that she had seen an âoutpouring of comments from customers and the online community in support of the iconic blue box logoâ and had decided to axe the new logo which first appeared on www.gap.com on Monday.
It then appeared on Gapâs Facebook profile and the retailerâs online followers began a tirade of angry comments about the logo which changed the font and made it black and added a small blue box in the top right hand corner.
âWeâve learned a lot in this process. And we are clear that we did not go about this in the right way. We recognize that we missed the opportunity to engage with the online community. This wasnât the right project at the right time for crowd sourcing.â
Gap North America president Marka Hansen
Hansen responded at the time by suggesting that the online community could submit designs themselves for a new logo.
However, today she said: âLast week, we moved quickly to address the feedback and began exploring how we could tap into all of the passion. Ultimately, weâve learned just how much energy there is around our brand. All roads were leading us back to the blue box, so weâve made the decision not to use the new logo on gap.com any further.
âWeâve learned a lot in this process. And we are clear that we did not go about this in the right way. We recognize that we missed the opportunity to engage with the online community. This wasnât the right project at the right time for crowd sourcing.â
She added that the logo may be changed in the future but that âwhen that time comes, weâll handle it in a different wayâ.
The retailer said that it would revert to its traditional logo on www.gap.com and would turn it red for the US holiday season.


















7 Readers' comments